Macron’s gebruik van symboliek is grootschalig, incl stemfraude
We zagen andere dag reeds dat Macron zijn intrede deed met het Europese volkslied in plaats van het Franse. Een symbolische communicatie naar het volk dat de EU onaantastbaar boven het Franse volk staat. Niet alleen is het Europese volkslied symbolisch… Ook de officiële uitslag van de verkiezing: Macron wint met 66,06% van de stemmen. Ja echt, 666, midden in je gezicht, maar de reguliere media blijft stil. En oh ja, dat stemmen ging ook niet helemaal eerlijk.
Lees meer: LangLeveEuropa.nl
A Global Warming Surprise
xploring some of the intricacies of GW [Global Warming] science can lead to surprising results that have major consequences. In a recent invited talk at the Heartland Institute’s ICCC-12 [Twelfth International Conference on Climate Change], I investigated three important topics:
1. Inconsistencies in the surface temperature record.
2. Their explanation as artifacts arising from the misuse of data.
3. Thereby explaining the failure of IPCC to find credible evidence for anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
Lees meer: AmericanThinker.com
Europe: Denying the Threat of Islamic Imperialism
- The UN report and Erdogan’s rhetoric both evidently expresses the Muslim world’s thoughts about what it apparently thinks should be the fate of Israel and Europe. So far, not a single Muslim state has condemned or opposed Erdogan’s aggression against Judeo-Christian civilization.
- The enemy is already inside the gates; many European regimes seem unaware that there is even a threat.
- The logic of much of Europe’s religious and political community seems to be that if the elephant in the room is spoken to nicely and made to look cute and adorable, people will not think of it as a threat to their safety.
The Western world can no longer ignore the problem of the latest the elephant in the room: Islamic imperialism. Europe has come to such a state of free speech trials, threats of censorship or, out of fear, self-censorship, that it seems to prefer putting the safety of its citizens at risk than admit that this elephant exists.
Lees meer: Gatestone Institute
Hepatitis B vaccinatie voor baby’s: overbodig en niet zonder gevaar?
De WHO (World Health Organization) heeft op 24 april jl. het startsein gegeven om via de “European Immunization Week” parlementsleden binnen de EU ertoe te bewegen om vaccinaties verplicht te gaan stellen voor iedereen.
Hepatitis B vaccinaties zijn een belangrijk onderdeel binnen het vaccinatiepakket, maar wat is Hepatitis B nu eigenlijk precies?
Lees meer: DeVrijeMedia.nl
Weather modification programs have been run by the US government since 1953
A few weeks ago, New York Times Magazine ran a column that asks if it’s ok “to tinker with the environment to fight climate change.” The piece, written by Jon Gertner, discusses a proposal made by Harvard Professor David Keith to use ten Gulfstream jets to spray 25,000 tons of liquid sulfur gas into the atmosphere in an attempt to combat global climate change. While Professor Keith argues that this sort of solar engineering is technologically feasible, he admits to having a tough time trying to determine whether or not such a practice is ethical.
Lees meer: NaturalNews.com
Scientists now pushing FAITH as the most important factor in “climate change” — if you believe it’s real, then it’s real
Has climate change gone from being just a scientific theory to a pseudo-scientific cult? A new “study” from the University of Warwick seems to underline the fact that the push for people to comply with the belief in global warming and human impact resides more in “faith,” than in science. In a world where anyone who even dares to question a single aspect of climate change and the hypotheses that are purported as facts is labeled “anti-science” and a “denier of truth,” it is more than ironic that they’ve actually shown faith, of all things, to be more important than anything else, when it comes to global warming.
Lees meer: NaturalNews.com
Mindless intolerance of climate change debate on full display as NYT columnist is blasted for suggesting people listen to BOTH sides of the argument
After months of being bullied by Trump supporters, Bret Stephens, a newly hired columnist for the New York Times’s opinion pages, has come under fire from the “nasty left” for casting doubt on aspects of climate change in his debut op-ed column.
He wrote about how absurd it is to blindly support climate change claims without listening to both sides. The former Wall Street Journal writer argued that scientific data and climate models create the misleading impression that we know what the impact of global warming will be. While he never stated that he believes climate change is fake, climate change alarmists went into overdrive, spitting hateful messages his way.
Lees meer: NaturalNews.com
Gelekte emails: Macron betrokken bij illegale wapens voor ISIS, drugs en belastingontduiking
Niet alleen de Franse, maar ook de andere Europese media zwijgen als het graf over de inhoud van de enorme lading gehackte emails van de met grote meerderheid gekozen nieuwe Franse president Emmanuel Macron. Uit de emails blijkt dat zo ongeveer alle ‘complottheorieën’ over Macron waarheid zijn, van het wegsluizen van miljoenen naar belastingparadijzen tot aan zijn betrokkenheid bij illegale wapen- en drugshandel. Ook staat nu vast dat Macron inderdaad vanaf het allereerste begin naar voren werd geschoven door de huidige politieke elite, en hij in werkelijkheid nooit een ‘onafhankelijke’ kandidaat is geweest.
Lees meer: JDreport.com
Schulden worden nu al via ECB op ons afgewenteld maar Macron wil eurozone regering en nog meer Franse schulden afschuiven
Ook ‘onze’ eigen premier Rutte juichte deze week de verkiezing van Emmanuel Macron toe, maar of hij werkelijk blij is met de nieuwe Franse president is maar de vraag. Zowel in Berlijn en Den Haag wordt met weerzin en zelfs huivering gekeken naar Macrons wensen, zoals de oprichting van een eurozone regering met een gezamenlijke begroting en gezamenlijke schulden. Daarmee wil Macron onhoudbaar hoge staatsschuld en enorme (sociale) uitgaven van zijn land handig afschuiven op de Duitsers en Nederlanders. Probleem in ons eigen land is dat de toekomstige coalitiepartners D66 en GroenLinks de grootste voorstanders zijn van het volledig opheffen van onze soevereiniteit ten gunste van zo’n Europese Superstaat.
Lees meer: JDreport.com
The Charade of Russian US Election Hacking. The Witch-Hunt Persists
In US judicial proceedings, beyond a reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof required.
In civil litigation, it’s either proof by a preponderance of evidence or by what’s clear and convincing – establishing a high probability of truth.
In criminal cases, the high proof standard of reasonable doubt is especially important because a defendant’s freedom or possible execution is at stake.
The same high standard is most important when one nation accuses another of criminal actions. War could follow false accusations accepted as factual.
Last March, neocon Dick Cheney called alleged foreign interference in America’s election an “act of war” – despite none occurring, baseless accusations alone.
Lees meer: GlobalResearch.ca
No, the “New” CNN Video of the Chemical Incident Does NOT Prove that the Syrian Government Did It
The Sun claims that CNN has released new footage of last month’s Syrian chemical incident … and strongly implies that the Syrian government was responsible.
Washington’s Blog asked MIT rocket scientist and chemical weapons expert Theodore Postol* what he thought of the footage.
Postol replied: I agree that the footage is harrowing. However none of it is new and none of it proves that the Syrian government was the perpetrator of a nerve agent attack.
As such, this article merely falls into the category of propaganda.
The kindest alternative description of the article is that it might instead be yet another example of bad reporting that mixes ill-considered assumptions with facts that may or may not be relevant to its conclusions.
This kind of reporting could actually be encouraging such attacks.
If there was a false flag nerve agent attack, this tells the perpetrators that when they engage in the murder of children they can build a stronger false case against the Syrian government and thereby increase their chances of creating political pressure on the US Government to intervene militarily on their behalf.
If people are sickened by the inhumanity of these events, they might want to consider alternative explanations of who might be responsible for the immoralities we are seeing.
Lees meer: ZeroHedge.com